Osoba:
Mathes, Tilo

Profilový obrázek
Emailová adresa
Datum narození
Výzkumné projekty
Organizační jednotky
Název pracovní pozice
Příjmení
Mathes
Křestní jméno
Tilo
ORCID iD
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9694-748X
Jméno

Filtry

20242
Resetovat filtry

Nastavení

Autor: Mathes, Tilo × Má soubory: true ×

Výsledky vyhledávání

Nyní se zobrazuje 1 - 2 z 2
  • Náhled není k dispozici
    PublikaceOtevřený přístup
    Setting the Stage for FAIR Digital Objects (FDOs) in Research
    (National Library of Technology, 2024) Mathes, Tilo; Blanchi, Christophe; Kalman, Tibor; Hellstrom, Maggie; Bingert, Sven; Bach, Felix
    The FAIR Digital Object (FDO) concept takes a further step, by requiring that much of the core metadata information is both accessible directly at the point of resolving an object's PID, and unambiguously formatted and presented in a way that computer processes – including AI – can easily act upon. In this way FDOs promises greater discoverability and machine actionability of research objects, allowing us to use the world’s research data more efficiently. However, FDOs are seen by many as overly complex and difficult to implement. Our session aims to demystify the concepts involved, and build a bridge between producers and users of "FAIR data" and "FAIR DO" proponents through examples illustrating what is required to upgrade digital objects from basic “FAIR for humans” to fully-fledged FDOs.
  • Náhled není k dispozici
    PublikaceOtevřený přístup
    Practical Implementation of PIDs in Research Platforms: Lessons & Next Steps
    (National Library of Technology, 2024) Mathes, Tilo
    In this talk, we overview the outcome of the "Enhancing interoperability through the use of PIDs in research platforms" project, which involved a collaboration between research tool providers and institutions to clarify, design, and implement IGSN IDs for material samples into the RSpace Inventory system, by integrating with DataCite’s DOI API. We focus on the practical challenges encountered: navigating close communication between multiple parties with varied backgrounds, such as gaps in conceptual knowledge around PIDs, differences in terminology used, and a lack of a clear framework for identifying the ideal allocation of responsibilities and roles within the PID workflow.